Iran

I am committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, recognizing that goal its the paramount importance for global security and regional stability. My policy is rooted in a balanced approach that not only addresses the immediate non-proliferation goals but also remains cognizant of the long-term potential for a constructive relationship with Iran.

I am an advocate for diplomatic engagement and rigorous, verifiable arms control agreements to ensure Iran’s nuclear program remains exclusively peaceful. While steadfastly opposing Iran’s nuclear ambitions, I also acknowledge the importance of dialogue and diplomatic efforts aimed at fostering mutual understanding and de-escalating tensions.

Recognizing the complexities of Iran’s political landscape, I can distinguish between the current regime’s extremist politics and the country’s broader potential. I believe in supporting the aspirations of the Iranian people for a secular and democratic government, which could eventually transform Iran into a strategic ally in the region.

My approach is to balance firm opposition to Iran’s extremist and destabilizing activities with open channels for diplomatic engagement, envisioning a future where a secular, stable Iran plays a constructive role in the international community. By maintaining pressure against nuclear proliferation while encouraging positive future outcomes, we can contribute to regional stability, uphold our non-proliferation goals, and lay the groundwork for a potential strategic partnership with Iran.

Support for Ukraine

I firmly support the continuation of both military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine amidst the ongoing Russian invasion. This commitment is rooted in a belief that defending democracies under siege is not merely an option but a fundamental obligation for the United States. Ukraine’s fight against unwarranted aggression stands as a stark embodiment of the battle between democratic sovereignty and authoritarian expansionism.

The U.S.’ unwavering support for Ukraine is predicated on the belief that free nations have the inalienable right to self-determination and liberty. The invasion by Russia is not only a breach of international law but a direct assault on these values. By standing with Ukraine, we uphold the international norms that have underpinned decades of relative peace and stability post-World War II. Failure to support Ukraine could set a dangerous precedent, signaling to authoritarian regimes worldwide that aggression and territorial conquests will be met with passive acquiescence.

Furthermore, our assistance to Ukraine transcends mere geopolitical strategy; it is a testament to our commitment to the universal principles of freedom, democracy, and human dignity. Allowing Ukraine to fall to Russian dominance would not only betray these values but would undermine global security, emboldening oppressive regimes to consider similar aggressive actions.

It is in that light that I am a champion for robust support for Ukraine, marrying military aid to ensure their self-defense with humanitarian assistance to alleviate the suffering of its people. This stance is integral to my broader foreign policy ethos, which prioritizes the defense of democratic institutions and the protection of human rights.

Terrorism & Non-state Actors

The U.S. must adeptly counter non-state actors and state-sponsored terrorist groups that aim to destabilize democracy and global peace. I support strategies that emphasize intelligence sharing, international cooperation, and targeted counterterrorism efforts that respect human rights and international law. Strengthening global norms against state-sponsored terrorism is crucial, alongside supporting nations vulnerable to terrorist exploits, thereby addressing security challenges without resorting to counterproductive military interventions.

Geopolitical Challenges

While China represents a significant geopolitical competitor, our immediate focus should be on Russia’s aggressive actions, which require a decisive and clear response. We need to take a firm stance against Russian interference and aggression, employing diplomatic, economic, and strategic tools to deter further hostilities. Simultaneously, maintaining a balanced approach towards China is vital, engaging constructively where possible, while firmly defending our interests and global stability.

Pragmatic Engagement

Ultimately, I support policies that pragmatically advance American interests. This means engaging with the world as it is, not as we wish it to be, making informed decisions that balance idealism with practicality, ensuring that American power and influence are wielded wisely, effectively, and responsibly on the global stage.

Stop Fighting Other People’s Wars

As the son of an Airman and a Marine, I firmly believe that American military intervention should be a last resort, reserved strictly for situations where our direct interests are at stake. The immense sacrifice entailed in putting American lives on the line must only be countenanced when our national security, citizens’ safety, or vital interests are unequivocally threatened. This principle guides our approach to military engagement, ensuring that the cost of American and civilian lives is never trivialized in conflicts that do not directly pertain to our nation’s core interests.